Comments on: Social Media or Pay-per-click?

By: fayetteville in townsend nc estate real

fayetteville in townsend nc estate real — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:59:49 +0000

estate nc fayetteville in real townsend estate fayetteville real townsend in nc

By: morgage home rates

morgage home rates — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:01:54 +0000

By: 70-502

70-502 — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:08:06 +0000

Yep!! i agree that the real problem with social media, is to track useful leads. But somehow, payper click is the best way to get useful leads at the end which help to generate sales at the end.

By: Search Engine Optimisation UK

Search Engine Optimisation UK — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:38:37 +0000

There’s no quick fix for seo… more like web 2.0 and 3/4 - ther’es no substitute for content and hard work…

By: SMMWhiz

SMMWhiz — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:42:39 +0000

The real problem with social media is that its very hard to track results and useful “leads” with social media.

The way in which marketers have been using social media so far has been similar to slash and burn agriculture - definitely not the way to go!

By: Toronto Web Hosting

Toronto Web Hosting — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:54:56 +0000

The point of quick SEO and income needs to be translated into hard work and dedication.

By: Acne

Acne — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:42:37 +0000

Web 2.0 Is not all it seems. I think there are other ways for improved SEO that need to be realised by webmasters. And the point of quick SEO and income needs to be translated into hard work and dedication.

Andy

By: Seattle Graphic Designer

Seattle Graphic Designer — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:07:34 +0000

Web 3.0, hogwash. Web 2.0 was just a “buzzword”, its just some stupid human ideal to have to categorize anything and everything. Let’s just keep doing our jobs and the internet will keep growing and changing and we don’t have to put a tag on it to sell it. It’ll sell anyway.