Comments on: They Have Too Much Trust http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust SEM and Internet marketing blog Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:34:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: brick cutting http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-1028 brick cutting Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:03:21 +0000 http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-1028 Page Rank is too easily manipulated so Google have to revert to manual hand editing of PR for particular sites. They need a human filter to make sure their algorithm doesn't get abused too much. Page Rank is too easily manipulated so Google have to revert to manual hand editing of PR for particular sites. They need a human filter to make sure their algorithm doesn’t get abused too much.

]]> By: sarah palin http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-890 sarah palin Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:32:31 +0000 http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-890 http://heroii.webhosting4free.info/sarahpal8b/|look here http://heroii.webhosting4free.info/sarahpal8b/|look here

]]> By: Chicago SEO http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-428 Chicago SEO Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:38:39 +0000 http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-428 I like the way you phrased it.. :) Seriously though, I was suspecting this sort of thing for quite a while now. I mean, wikipedia ranks #1 for some keywords that it really shouldn't and the space is taken away from sites that really deserve that spot (so much for "Don't be evil", eh?). It just defied logic that it would rank so purely through the algorithm... at least till now. Thanks for clearing this issue for us! I like the way you phrased it.. :)

Seriously though, I was suspecting this sort of thing for quite a while now. I mean, wikipedia ranks #1 for some keywords that it really shouldn’t and the space is taken away from sites that really deserve that spot (so much for “Don’t be evil”, eh?). It just defied logic that it would rank so purely through the algorithm… at least till now.

Thanks for clearing this issue for us!

]]> By: Charles http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-273 Charles Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:01:09 +0000 http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-273 I have to agree about ABOUT.COM. What a useless site of half answers and buckets of ads. Wikipedia used to be okay until they decided to not link out and re-write other site owner's content. I have to agree about ABOUT.COM. What a useless site of half answers and buckets of ads. Wikipedia used to be okay until they decided to not link out and re-write other site owner’s content.

]]> By: Code4gold http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-176 Code4gold Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:26:51 +0000 http://www.jadehat.com/2007/trust#comment-176 I'm 100% in agreement with you. About.com is about as big of drivel as Wikipedia or YouTube. Hell, if people want to go search About, Wikipedia or YouTube, they have comprehensive search on the site, no need for G! to pimp those tertiary results into their search results. I’m 100% in agreement with you. About.com is about as big of drivel as Wikipedia or YouTube. Hell, if people want to go search About, Wikipedia or YouTube, they have comprehensive search on the site, no need for G! to pimp those tertiary results into their search results.

]]>